Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GovernmentShrinker
All I asked about was one hypothetical case that you posed that struck me as a straw dog. You had a more or less dead patient on a ventilator, wasting money. For such a patient there is no issue in turning off the ventilator, so the scenario doesn't ring true.

We don't need more reasons to ration care and snuff inconvenient patients. That's just socialized medicine at work. We need to get the government out of medicine and to restore free health care markets. Medical decisions should be private.

112 posted on 06/29/2006 6:03:14 PM PDT by T'wit (It is not possible to "go too far" criticizing liberals. No matter what you say, they're worse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies ]


To: T'wit

I'm totally with you on getting government out of paying for health care. But there do need to be clear laws about when it's permissible to "unplug" a patient, or otherwise hasten death, or there will be an awful lot of private decisions to "snuff inconvenient patients". My personal opinion is that it should be legal to give lethal injections when a decision to stop any support has been reached, after proper legal procedures. The notion that it's okay to slowly starve and dehydrate someone to death, as was done to Terri Schiavo, but not okay to end their lives quickly with no risk of suffering, stikes me as preposterous -- there's always a small risk that the patient has more awareness than the tests show, and even if the patient is utterly unaware it's still an awful thing to put relatives and medical staff through.


114 posted on 06/30/2006 12:04:15 PM PDT by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson