IN A 'PINCH': RETHINKING THE FIRST AMENDMENT (Which came first, the 'journalist' or the traitor?)

;)

Interesting.... This is one of only 13 posts by you in more than a year.

ping

Prosecuting Sulzberger and the Times is both a moral and a survival imperative

Whoever knowingly and willfully communicates, furnishes, transmits, or otherwise makes available to an unauthorized person, or publishes, or uses in any manner prejudicial to the safety or interest of the United States or for the benefit of any foreign government to the detriment of the United States any classified information . . . concerning the communication intelligence activities of the United States...
. . . shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both [emphasis added].

In addition, Shut down the N Y Times. - ["emphasis added"]

So the NYT is traitorous but the WSJ isn't?

WSJ had their own version of the story the same day as the NYT. So did LAT. Do we prosecute and shut them down, too?

I saw that in the WSJ and I'll have to mull over/re-read it again and then come back for a reply to your query.

>>>WSJ had their own version of the story the same day as the NYT. So did LAT. Do we prosecute and shut them down, too?<<<

I canceled my subscription to the anti-American Wall Street Journal years ago. Shut them down, and lock them up.

How many posts I've made is relevent to what?

I don't believe the Federalists ever argued that the Democratic-Republicans became journalists in order to commit treason with impunity.

And I can't believe anyone would have the thought processes to believe that someone became a journalist for the sole reason to commit treason. Do you honestly know how ridiculous that sounds?!?

Obviously, not much has inspired you to partake in the give and take here at FR. That your rare entry would take the form of a fatuous ad hominem says something about you.

It doesn't work quite that directly. The process is subtle. Insideous. Reflexive. Subliminal. Check out Columbia and the rest of the J-schools....

insidious

That said, I believe Pinch Sulzberger is a special case. He was radicalized at an early age and First-Amendment protection was always his for the asking.

I believe his exploitation of the press is calculated and that America-hating sedition is the driving force (at least when the president is a Republican).

bump-er ;)

"Fatuous ad hominem"? LOL

Have you looked at what you're posting? I mean really critically taken a step back and looked? The people that say "never judge a book by it's cover" have obviously never been on a job interview. Because no one will listen to what you're telling them if you look like a freak.

i followed you for like a page, but then the post started getting really weird. alien abductions?...
no one will listen...--Diavolos

If you google the following random sample of topics I've written about,
(starting with the one that was obviously way above your head--if you get my point),
I think you might find otherwise....

alien abductions flying saucers -->

Alien Abductions, Flying Saucers + Other Weird Phenomena, c.1992-2000 (#2 / 268,000)
hillary liar-->

hillary clinton is a "CONGENITAL LIAR" ("I am not a crook.") (#1 / 1,360,000)
hillary victim -->

HEAR SUSAN ESTRICH: hillary plays 'the victim' for votes (#6 / 3,740,000)

hillary clinton, courtesan: retrograde feminist fraud plays victim (again) to win White House (#7 / 3,740,000)
hillary nuclear -->

HILLARY GOES NUCLEAR: proliferation in the age of clinton (#2 / 6,740,000)
clinton nuclear proliferation -->

HILLARY GOES NUCLEAR: proliferation in the age of clinton (#2 / 2,190,000 )
hillary rape -->

HILLARY + THE CLINTON RAPE OF JUANITA BROADDRICK: WAS ANN COULTER TOO TIMID? (6 / 2,850,000)

HILLARY CLINTON KNEW ABOUT THE RAPE: HEAR JUANITA BROADDRICK (7 / 2,850,000)
hillary flunked -->

HILLARY FLUNKS D.C. BAR EXAM ("the smartest woman in the world" seeks less competitive venue) (#1 / 77,800 )

Jeanine: INDEFINITE PRISON/PSYCH-WARD TERM FOR RAPISTS... (#2 / 77,800 )

hillarytalks (#8 / 77,800 )

New York, New York -- if hillary can't make it there, she can't make it anywhere (#9 / 77,800 )

DEMOCRATIC FASCISM [beware hillary clinton] (#10 / 77,800 )
clinton ignored terrorism -->

WHY DID BILL CLINTON IGNORE TERRORISM?
Was it simply the constraints of his liberal mindset, or was it something even more threatening to our national security? (#5 / 3,560,000 )
united 93 clinton 9/11 -->

UNITED 93:THE CLINTON-9/11 NEXUS (#1 / 1,250,000)
albright clinton terrorism -->

ALBRIGHT INDICTS CLINTON FOR TERRORISM FAILURE(and doesn't even know it) (#1 / 616,000 )

MISSING CLINTON AUDIO! 'Can we kill 'em tomorrow?' (+Albright-Fulbright-Nobel TERRORISM revelations) (#2 / 616,000 )
deconstructing clinton -->

Deconstructing clinton... "just because I could" (#1 / 188,000 )

THE FAILED, DYSFUNCTIONAL CLINTON PRESIDENCY (DECONSTRUCTING CLINTON'S HOFSTRA SPEECH) (#2 / 188,000)

THE FAILED, DYSFUNCTIONAL CLINTON PRESIDENCY (DECONSTRUCTING CLINTON'S HOFSTRA SPEECH) (#5 / 188,000)
failed dysfunctional clinton -->

THE FAILED, DYSFUNCTIONAL CLINTON PRESIDENCY (DECONSTRUCTING CLINTON'S HOFSTRA SPEECH) (#1 and #8 / 351,000)

A CALL TO IMPEACH CLINTON IN ABSENTIA (#2 / 351,000 )

THE FAILED, DYSFUNCTIONAL CLINTON PRESIDENCY (DECONSTRUCTING CLINTON'S HOFSTRA SPEECH) (#3 / 351,000)

WHY DID BILL CLINTON IGNORE TERRORISM?
Was it simply the constraints of his liberal mindset, or was it something even more threatening to our national security? (#4 / 351,000)

UNITED 93:THE CLINTON-9/11 NEXUS (#7 / 188,000 )
clinton rape charge -->

I'll SEE ANN COULTER'S 'BILL CLINTON RAPE CHARGE' AND RAISE HER 'ONE HILLARY CLINTON (#1 / 2,750,00)
soros animal farm -->

HEAR SOROS: Left's Fatally Flawed "Animal Farm" Mentality(Why We Must NEVER AGAIN Elect a Dem Prez) (#1 / 141,000 )