To: jla
I ask you to provide one proof of evolution and you say "View replies" ????????
What kind of answer is that?
I though my question was clear in that I was asking you about your post "Probably because they're the people surrounded by clear evidence of evolution all the time."
What "evidence of evolution" are you referring to? From everything I've read, every time the evolutionist come up with the so call "Missing Link" it has been latter proven to be false. Please provide your proof that goes beyond the theory hype.
To: Russ_in_NC
Calm down there, Russ, I wasn't the one you had asked. I was pointing out the absence of responses to your query.
97 posted on
06/27/2006 7:58:17 AM PDT by
jla
To: Russ_in_NC
...every time the evolutionist come up with the so call "Missing Link" it has been latter proven to be false....Please give three examples, not including Piltdown (since it was never claimed to be a missing link, simply an extinct side branch)
Which of these links (none are missing, obviously) between reptiles and mammals are false?
Source
To: Russ_in_NC
From everything I've read, every time the evolutionist come up with the so call "Missing Link" it has been latter proven to be false. Don't drink the Kool-Aid.
Here's a list of transitionals. Two notable ones are Archaeopteryx and Tiktaalik--a lizard with feathers and wings and a fish with legs.
343 posted on
06/28/2006 5:32:42 AM PDT by
ahayes
("If intelligent design evolved from creationism, then why are there still creationists?"--Quark2005)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson