Ok, I reread it. It's worse than I thought. I've always expected this from the Left; now such comments seem common on the right.
The difference is that Bush's WMD statements seem to have been based on observations but made in good faith. (It's not clear how such observations could be checked.) In no way can Coulter's comments on science have been made in good faith; she gets facts (not just opinions) wrong. It's not like there aren't thousands of people who could have proof-read her stuff.
I hate to say it, but Ann is starting to remind me of Jim Carville.
What scientific facts did she get wrong? Other than evolution.