Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JohnLongIsland

How is this do as I say, not as I do? There is no contradiction that I can see between giving away a lot of money to charity and paying an estate tax. He's going to do both.


16 posted on 06/26/2006 7:19:36 PM PDT by Huck (Hey look, I'm still here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: Huck

good socialist dogma dictates that the government is so much wiser in knowing how to spend your money than any individual. hillary and her treasonous gang should decide how to spend the omaha oracle's money not mr. gates.


35 posted on 06/26/2006 7:34:26 PM PDT by JohnLongIsland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: Huck; JohnLongIsland
How is this do as I say, not as I do? There is no contradiction that I can see between giving away a lot of money to charity and paying an estate tax. He's going to do both.

With estate tax rates starting where they do, most Americans, even the most workaholic, will not be able to leave a house to each of their children and a college education to each of their grandchildren without being savaged by estate taxes.

Is that too much to ask after a lifetime of working yourself to death?

Yet, here is Warren Buffett who, even if he paid estate taxes and gave away 80% of his wealth would still be able to leave each of his kids hundreds of millions of dollars and that man still sickeningly pontificates about "not giving incredible head starts to certain people who were very selective about the womb from which they emerged".

In the mean time, people such as Bill Gates and Warren Buffett are building multi-billion ego monuments to themselves by creating their foundations ESTATE TAX FREE.

In our town, we have a Carnegie Library still boosting Carnegie's ego over a century after he died. Carnegie, however, gave his gift when there was no estate tax.

Warren Buffet's attitude concerning the average American workaholic who kills himself to leave his children and grandchildren a $4 million estate to be divided between then for college educations and help in purchasing their first homes is no more revolting than Marie Antoinette's dismissive, "Let them eat cake."

If Warren Buffett gave a rat's rectum about the average American, he would at least be advocating raising the minimum threshold for estate taxes instead of advocating that no change should be made.

55 posted on 06/26/2006 8:01:17 PM PDT by Polybius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: Huck
There is no contradiction that I can see between giving away a lot of money to charity and paying an estate tax.

You don't know the difference between choice in giving and confiscation by the government?

Even a three year old knows the difference.

It's mind boggling how many people are stuck on stooopid.

86 posted on 06/26/2006 10:03:00 PM PDT by Cobra64 (All we get are lame ideas from Republicans and lame criticism from dems about those lame ideas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson