Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: just truth please

Tell me again what the compelling reason is that THE new york times disclosed the program:

1. Because they uncovered government abuses in the program;

2. Because the program is unconstitutional;

3. Because they could?


39 posted on 06/24/2006 4:11:52 PM PDT by Loyal Buckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Loyal Buckeye

Add a 4th. Try Marxists! Maybe a 5th, destroy Democracy.


84 posted on 06/24/2006 7:35:58 PM PDT by just truth please
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

To: Loyal Buckeye
Tell me again what the compelling reason is that THE new york times disclosed the program:

1. Because they uncovered government abuses in the program;

2. Because the program is unconstitutional;

3. Because they could?

I have not seen any evidence of #1.

#2 could not be any more incorrect. There is a Supreme Court ruling that states this action is expressly allowed under the constitution. In response to that ruling, Congress specified the procedure for obtaining warrants and that procedure was followed exactly. The law is overwhelimgly on the side of the administration here.

99 posted on 06/25/2006 8:17:33 AM PDT by CMAC51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson