Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pollyannaish; Indy Pendance

The President had several options in forming a response to Kelo.

He could have:
1. Pushed for an act of Congress to restrict the Federal Government's ED doctrine.
2. Publicly responded to Kelo and asked for state governments to restrict ED in their locales.
3. Done nothing.
4. Sign a piece of paper that can be rescinded on Jan 21st 2009 leaving the citizens of this country oppressed under Kelo when it comes to all future Kelo related ED takings.

The President has down some great politicking on the "ownership society" in the past, Kelo was a slap in the face to his personal, public, and political history, and he hasn't responded. Federal plans in N.O. and surrounding locales have the potential for the Fed gove to use ED in a major way to clear out flood plains, and this EO does what to protect local residents? Nothing really.

And I support heavy restrictions on rebuilding in NO.


66 posted on 06/23/2006 3:49:10 PM PDT by JerseyHighlander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]


To: JerseyHighlander
Federal plans in N.O. and surrounding locales have the potential for the Fed gove to use ED in a major way to clear out flood plains, and this EO does what to protect local residents? Nothing really.

Unless it is for a federal project, the federal government would not do the taking. If the feds clear out flood plains to let the land lie vacant, then that would be a federal project, I guess, and subject to current law.

Kelo gave governments the power to do takings for private corporations for private interests. This EO prevents the feds from doing that, but not state or local governments.

76 posted on 06/23/2006 3:54:50 PM PDT by sinkspur (Today, we settled all family business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

To: JerseyHighlander
Then I take it you disagree with him on this. That is fair enough. I have a feeling that he asked his staff to do an in-depth study of this issue shortly after the ruling came down.

While waiting, he appointed two good conservatives to the court.

Once the feasibility studies where completed, my suspicion is that he chose to implement the one with the least overhead as a stop gap until the others could be accomplished. That is how he does things. And I for one, do not think he is finished with this issue.

Stay tuned.
106 posted on 06/23/2006 4:13:24 PM PDT by pollyannaish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson