Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: hedgetrimmer; potlatch; Smartass; devolve; Czar; Borax Queen; janetgreen
...Nothing in this order shall be construed to prohibit a taking of private property by the Federal Government, that otherwise complies with applicable law, for the purpose of:

(a) public ownership or exclusive use of the property by the public, such as for a ....roadway,....governmental office building, or military reservation;

(b) projects designated for public, common carrier, public transportation, or public utility use, including those for which a fee is assessed, that serve the general public and are subject to regulation by a governmental entity;

c) conveying the property to a nongovernmental entity, such as a telecommunications or transportation common carrier, that makes the property available for use by the general public as of right;

Plans for the Canadian, USA, Mexico Corridor (including any governmental confiscation for easements) remains intact.

29 posted on 06/23/2006 3:26:12 PM PDT by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: nicmarlo

You beat me to saying that. NASCO supercorridor here we come!


41 posted on 06/23/2006 3:31:49 PM PDT by hedgetrimmer ("I'm a millionaire thanks to the WTO and "free trade" system--Hu Jintao top 10 worst dictators)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

To: nicmarlo
Plans for the Canadian, USA, Mexico Corridor (including any governmental confiscation for easements) remains intact.

As does expansions for existing interstates.

In Texas, compensation for takings for the Trans-Texas Corridor will be paid by a private corporation.

47 posted on 06/23/2006 3:34:20 PM PDT by sinkspur (Today, we settled all family business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

To: nicmarlo
"Plans for the Canadian, USA, Mexico Corridor (including any governmental confiscation for easements) remains intact."

I'm sure the usual suspects will be along shortly to explain why all of this is merely business as usual and poses no real sovereignty threats to the United States.

Our FR pretend-conservatives are even now going into the spin mode.

73 posted on 06/23/2006 3:53:04 PM PDT by Czar ( StillFedUptotheTeeth@Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

To: nicmarlo

Is there a link to the proposed corridor? I heard about a page dedicated to it but dont remember it and would not know what to keyword to find it. Any help?


90 posted on 06/23/2006 4:04:20 PM PDT by IllumiNaughtyByNature (My Pug is On Her War Footing (and moving to Texas!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

To: nicmarlo

Thanks nic, interesting read!


146 posted on 06/23/2006 4:56:57 PM PDT by potlatch (Does a clean house indicate that there is a broken computer in it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

To: nicmarlo

No reason they shouldn't. Xenophobic paranoia is no reason to change them.


208 posted on 06/23/2006 8:27:19 PM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (If you believe ANYTHING in the Treason Media you are a fool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

To: nicmarlo
(d) preventing or mitigating a harmful use of land that constitutes a threat to public health, safety, or the environment;
comes on the heels of
“in case of an extraordinary disease emergency, the Secretary of Agriculture has broad and expansive authority to seize and dispose of any animal, including wildlife.”

Do you think there is any connection?
238 posted on 06/24/2006 2:21:53 PM PDT by hedgetrimmer ("I'm a millionaire thanks to the WTO and "free trade" system--Hu Jintao top 10 worst dictators)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson