Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DaveTesla; nicmarlo; hedgetrimmer; potlatch; Smartass; devolve; Czar; Borax Queen; janetgreen
The non-effect of this on the NAFTA SuperHighways was noted by Dan Byfield of the American Land Foundation, a couple weeks ago here.
258 posted on 10/13/2006 10:46:55 AM PDT by Paul Ross (We cannot be for lawful ordinances and for an alien conspiracy at one and the same moment.-Cicero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Paul Ross; hedgetrimmer; B4Ranch; texastoo; Kimberly GG; potlatch; ntnychik; PhilDragoo; ...


The polls are out and it's only going to get worse folks.   The tears and hand wringing will come in November, when these lemonade drinking Open Border Lobbyists realize how THEY personally played their part here to destroy the Republican party.   How so called conservatives on his forum can be duped into turning America into a socialistic state escapes me.
Carl Marx/Lenin would be proud of them!


Make no mistake, when the smoke clears, this is who,
and what open borders are all about.
Enough said!



 

259 posted on 10/13/2006 11:10:24 AM PDT by Smartass (The stars rule men but God rules the stars)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 258 | View Replies ]

To: Paul Ross; hedgetrimmer; B4Ranch; OXENinFLA; bitt; JustPiper; KittyKares; MamaDearest; ...
Excerpted.
Source: The Open Borders Lobby and the Nation's Security After 9/11
This is a very long read, but will add support to left wing and ACLU movements for open borders. 
 
The Open Borders Lobby and the Nation's Security After 9/11
By William Hawkins and Erin Anderson
FrontPageMagazine.com | January 21, 2004


Forward – by David Horowitz

There are few issues so important to the life of a nation as the integrity of its borders and the nature of its citizenship. These are issues that define its identity and shape its future. When a nation is at war, moreover, its ability to regulate and control its borders is a security matter of paramount importance.

The following text by William Hawkins and Erin Anderson describes how America’s borders have been under assault for forty years with consequences that are measurable and disturbing. The assault has been led by an open borders lobby that is sophisticated and powerful. Many of its components, moreover, have a history of antagonism to American purposes and a record of active support for America’s enemies. Its funders are multi-billion dollar entities, who are unaccountable and unscrutinized.  They have more discretionary incomes at their disposal to influence these issues than is possessed by either political party, or any business group, or even the federal government itself.

As Hawkins and Anderson show, the open borders campaign was already instrumental in damaging the nation’s ability to defend itself before 9/11. Yet not even this terrible event has caused its activists to have second thoughts, or tempered their reckless attacks. Instead, the open borders lobby has expanded its efforts to eliminate America’s border controls to include the active defense of terrorists and terrorist organizations and a continuing assault on the very policies the federal government has adopted to defend its citizens from terrorist attacks.

A Ford Foundation newsletter the authors cite features an interview with Georgetown law professor David Cole, a leading academic figure in the open borders campaign, who has written a book attacking America’s immigration laws and their protections against terrorist groups. In the interview, Cole denounces, “the criminalization of what the government calls material support for terrorist organizations. This is a practice that was introduced … through the immigration law, … It criminalizes any support of any blacklisted terrorist organization without regard to whether one’s support actually had any connection whatsoever to terrorist activity that the group undertakes.”

The Ford Foundation interview with Cole was published with hindsight in September 2003, ten years after the first World Trade Center bombing and two years after the September 11 attack. As Hawkins and Anderson point out, the anti-terrorist law which Professor Cole is denouncing was introduced as legislation and passed during the Clinton Administration in response to the first World Trade Center bombing and other terrorist plots. It was a bi-partisan effort to put a check on terrorist support groups that were using use the liberties afforded by the American legal system to aid and abet terrorist activities. Shortly after the interview with Cole appeared, it was revealed that the Ford Foundation had granted millions of tax-exempt dollars to terrorist support groups and other radical organizations in the Middle East.[1] 


260 posted on 10/13/2006 11:28:00 AM PDT by Smartass (The stars rule men but God rules the stars)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 258 | View Replies ]

To: Paul Ross; devolve

Thank you for the info ping Paul.


261 posted on 10/13/2006 11:32:23 AM PDT by potlatch (Does a clean house indicate that there is a broken computer in it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 258 | View Replies ]

To: Paul Ross
"Protecting the property rights of whom? The fact that no one in the property-rights movement had any idea it was coming or, for that matter, requested it, should be cause for suspicion. After reading it, suspicion is confirmed."

Says it all.

More smoke and mirrors engineered by our Washington NWO/Globalist elites specifically for the stupid, the unwary and the uninformed. Only the party-above-principle GOP/RNC Big Tent party loyalists will buy it.

267 posted on 10/13/2006 3:53:50 PM PDT by Czar ( StillFedUptotheTeeth@Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 258 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson