Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: KoRn
But this doesn't apply to local governments, who have been abusing the most. I'm to the point of believing a constitutional amendment is needed to protect private property.

Or you can elect a mayor and city council, or school board reps, who won't take private property every time a member of Sam Walton's family shows up.

213 posted on 06/23/2006 8:39:40 PM PDT by sinkspur (Today, we settled all family business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies ]


To: sinkspur
"Or you can elect a mayor and city council, or school board reps, who won't take private property every time a member of Sam Walton's family shows up."

Very true, but those are an endangered species in our body politic. Just 4 years ago I saw a beautiful mansion get demolished and a super Wal-Mart is there today, I suppose the mansion was "condemned". Sure citizens can take action in many communities to prevent such things, but I believe we need an amendment to protect our private property from these politicians and others who would want to take away from us what is ours.

218 posted on 06/23/2006 9:03:10 PM PDT by KoRn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson