Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pbrown
In my view there's no basis to expect Merck to run ads against promiscuous sex rather than expend funds on research...Nowadays, there are advertisements of Trojans on TV. That sends a clear signal to young people. Why not have an advertisement stating that pre-martial sex could give a young woman Cervical cancer?...Should Merck run ads against speeding?...Huh?

People die as a result of speeding just as they do as a result of HPV.

I've no problem with an ad campaign about the risks of pre-marital sex. I just don't think it's Merck's responsibility, and certainly not an alternative to research.

83 posted on 06/23/2006 8:51:42 AM PDT by SJackson (The Pilgrims—Doing the jobs Native Americans wouldn’t do!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]


To: SJackson
There's been pre-martial sex for eons, it isn't going away anytime soon that I can see. I'm glad there's a vaccine out there now.

For those who practice abstinence, they don't have to worry about that being the cause of Cervical cancer.

93 posted on 06/23/2006 8:59:03 AM PDT by processing please hold (If you can't stand behind our military, stand in front of them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson