What on earth are you talking about?
And you haven't even begun to address the substitution costs for the supposed 'beneficial' mutations that also need to move to fixation, in addition to the substitution costs for these supposed 'inactive viral infections'. It's all additive, you know and that's not in your favor.
And your 'exact match' has deteriorated to 'exactly consistent' before you presented your first reference. The most supportive articles I know of in the scientific literature only claim to be 'broadly consistent' w/ the phylogenetic 'tree'.
Do you know what you are talking about?