[LibertarianSchmoe]

I don't know enough about ERVs to know whether such a proposition is reasonable or laughable. Perhaps if I heard your alternative, it might seem more reasonable to me.

How is it that you know so much about ERVs without the help of 'science' (yours or someone else's)? Also, what is it about ID that instills such credulity in you?

[GourmetDan]

You are confused. Belief in creation is based on incredulity. There's nothing wrong w/ that. Like most evos, Dawkins thought it was cute without thinking through to it's logical end; that evolution was then based upon credulity.

It is credulity that is the problem and that is a requirement for evolution.

And evidently you don't understand that I got no problem with science. It's metaphysics masquerading as science that I have a problem with.

You can't tell the difference.

I can.