Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GourmetDan; Stultis
The point here is that, in criminal forensics, the evidence must still be reviewed and decided by a jury. This is a metaphysical process. ...

The judge's charge is to weigh the evidence and testimony. This is a reality-based, not a metaphysical, exercise.

PS: what definition of "metaphysics" are you using here?

844 posted on 07/08/2006 3:00:27 PM PDT by Virginia-American
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 801 | View Replies ]


To: Virginia-American; GourmetDan; js1138
what definition of "metaphysics" are you using here?

His...

848 posted on 07/08/2006 3:15:50 PM PDT by Stultis (I don't worry about the war turning into "Vietnam" in Iraq; I worry about it doing so in Congress.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 844 | View Replies ]

To: Virginia-American

I gave the definition of metaphysical several days ago.

The only issue here is that you want to use a definition of 'concrete evidence' that includes metaphysical explanations of a fact and I don't.

That is one of the main methods used to make 'evolution' appear stronger than it is. Talk about imaginary past events as though they are real. It fools the little evos every time.

That's why you are confused. It's not that difficult to understand.

In reality, the concrete evidence is the same with the only difference being the interpretations that are layered over that evidence.

Creation is equally valid as an explanation of the evidence as evolution. The evos are terrified to admit that fact though because they realize that they would lose all credibility if it became widely known.

Hence, the huge fight to conceal the metaphysical nature of evolution.


861 posted on 07/10/2006 8:44:38 AM PDT by GourmetDan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 844 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson