Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GourmetDan
Except that the observations (aka facts) are also consistent w/ a created biology that is in decline.

How so? What observations of biology lead to the conclusion of creation and decline?
775 posted on 07/06/2006 8:16:13 AM PDT by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 773 | View Replies ]


To: Dimensio

Speciation, genetic load, sexual reproduction, deleterious mutation, DNA error-correction schemes, diploid genetic structure and triplet-codon coding structure.

All either evidence of decline or features designed to resist decline.

In the case of sexual reproduction, DNA error-correction schemes, diploid genetic structure and triplet-codon coding; these all significantly *slow* the possibility of any putative 'evolution' and fall heavily on the side of conserving existing information.

The data says life was created. Evolution is the result of a faulty first-premise called 'commitment to naturalism'.

Now, naturalism is fine if you are dealing in the technical areas of science. It does not work once you cross over into the metaphysical realm. Evolution is metaphysical naturalism and is invalid.


776 posted on 07/06/2006 8:32:28 AM PDT by GourmetDan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 775 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson