Doesn't matter where it occurs.
Points were, the 'extension' process and human interpretation.
Since you did not address those points, I assume that you recognize they are fatal to the claim.
You seem to want to make radiocarbon dating into some kind of second-rate guesswork. That is not accurate.
I have been working with radiocarbon dates for some 25 years, and know a bit about the process. I'll trust the professionals I work with and the study I have done.
Bye.