Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Coyoteman

I agree she stated that on page 220, but her book is well researched so I don't know how anyone could say she is definitely incorrect.


451 posted on 06/25/2006 1:04:20 PM PDT by demkicker (democrats and terrorists are intimate bedfellows)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 447 | View Replies ]


To: demkicker
I agree she stated that on page 220,

Then she was in error?

454 posted on 06/25/2006 1:28:56 PM PDT by OmahaFields
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 451 | View Replies ]

To: demkicker

Here is where she probably erred. Each subdivision is 5-6 million years long. Adding all the subdivisions you get 30 to 40 million years. Probably just carelessness on her part or one of here writers fed her the error. No big deal. OTOH, if she knew what she was talking about she would have caught the error.

The chart at left shows the major subdivisions of the Cambrian Period for North America (Laurentia during the Cambrian). International ages (subdivisions) have not been established. The size of the bars does not correlate with the length of time for each age. The oldest unnamed age is 543 to 520 million years ago, while the remaining six ages are from 520 to 490 million years ago, each approximately 5-6 million years long.


455 posted on 06/25/2006 1:34:21 PM PDT by OmahaFields
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 451 | View Replies ]

To: demkicker; OmahaFields
This is an interesting read about details of the Cambrian explosion.
457 posted on 06/25/2006 2:21:14 PM PDT by demkicker (democrats and terrorists are intimate bedfellows)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 451 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson