[Coyoteman]

read it yourself and then try arguing that she doesn't destroy Darwin's theory of evolution.

She destroys the theory of evolution as much as the creationist websites do (i.e., not at all). The nature and quality of the research is pretty similar in both cases; didn't she even get much of her evolution material from a creationist?

(This is but one small example of what passes for science on creationist websites.)

[demkicker]

Wrong. I can tell you haven't read her book either.