I understand. You can't defend her "FACTS" and thus are unwilling to engage in a dicussion of them. First one irrational excuse and then another irrational excuse. Either that or you have not really read the book.
Your posts are irrational and you don't understand squat. FYI, I've read the book and I am not about to spend my Sunday typing out all the tons of examples in her book that skeptics like you would require. Get off your lazy butt and read it yourself and then try arguing that she doesn't destroy Darwin's theory of evolution.