Replies

To: Stultis

Nothing about 'selection' that is inconsistent with a created genome that is in decline.

Nothing about 'variation' acted on by 'selection' that is inconsistent with a created genome that is in decline.

Nothing about 'evolution' at all that is inconsistent with a created genome that is in decline.

No unique evidence that supports evolution-only at all.

This makes 'evolution' metaphysical.

294 posted on 06/23/2006 1:33:52 PM PDT by GourmetDan

[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 291 | View Replies ]

To: GourmetDan

BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

297 posted on 06/23/2006 1:46:20 PM PDT by balrog666 (There is no freedom like knowledge, no slavery like ignorance. - Ali ibn Ali-Talib)

[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 294 | View Replies ]

To: GourmetDan

No unique evidence that supports evolution-only at all.

So none of these qualify, eh?

29+ Evidences for Macroevolution: The Scientific Case for Common Descent

300 posted on 06/23/2006 1:57:31 PM PDT by Stultis (I don't worry about the war turning into "Vietnam" in Iraq; I worry about it doing so in Congress.)

[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 294 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search

News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794