Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: stands2reason
I've yet to see a positive scientific argument for a >10,000 year Earth.

I have received radiocarbon dates in the 10-11,000 year range. My immediate colleagues have some even older.

Anything else?

123 posted on 06/22/2006 4:11:30 PM PDT by Coyoteman (Stupidity is the only universal capital crime; the sentence is death--Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies ]


To: Coyoteman

I think he might have hit the wrong inequality sign.


154 posted on 06/22/2006 6:40:49 PM PDT by hail to the chief (Use your conservatism liberally)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies ]

To: Coyoteman; OmahaFields
That was a typo.

I meant to write <10,000 year old Earth.

You mean you have failed to understand any of the scientific reasoning on the age of the earth since you do not have a firm grasp on science and math.

Or maybe it was just a fricken typo. Sheesh.

256 posted on 06/22/2006 11:13:57 PM PDT by stands2reason (Rivers will run dry and mountains will crumble, but two wrongs will never make a right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson