I never said or implied it refutes your cosmology. Only that your alternate mappings of cosmology are commonplace and irrelevant.
Science ignores anything that doesn't suggest research.
As I said, it applies equally to heliocentrism as one of those 'alternate mappings of cosmology' that is commonplace and irrelevant.
You would agree that heliocentrism is ignored as an object of research, wouldn't you? That makes it irrelvant and it certainly is commonplace.
That's because, as Sir Fred Hoyle stated, the two models have been determined to be dynamically equivalent and there is no additional scientific knowledge to be discovered there.
Nice try, but you merely show the equivalence of the heliocentric and geocentric models, not the 'inferiority' of geocentrism nor the 'superiority' of heliocentrism.
I doubt that you understand it at that level, however.
So much for your 'psychotic' comment in post 1098. You are shown to be as uninformed as I said in post 1099 and as the one who could be 'twelve' as you indicated in post 1100.