Again, I understand why you need to characterize my position as though I believe 'everything is metaphysical' in spite of my constant explanations of the differences between evidence and metaphysics with examples that clearly distinguish between evidence and metaphysics.
I also understand why you feel a need to post irrelevant pictures; you are out of arguments and need to maintain your mental paradigm so you grasp at any tactic available.
This is exactly why the creation movement is growing and evolution is failing. You're on the wrong side with impotent arguments.
You continue to try to paint your opponents with the same old brush and it just isn't working anymore.
You look foolish.
If you understood, you would know why that picture is not irrelevant.
To expand upon your argument: When only things that you can detect now with the five senses are real, and everything else is metaphysical, then all things of the distant past, like that lovely centaur, are equally "real."