Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Coyoteman

You post a definition that applies directly to the metaphysical nature of evolution and then merely pretend that it doesn't. Course, none of the little evos will 'get it' cause you told them what to think with your glib remark.

So what part of that definition did you not understand?

Do we need to go over the difference between *evidence* and 'interpretations of evidence' again?


1,058 posted on 07/18/2006 5:58:36 AM PDT by GourmetDan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1053 | View Replies ]


To: GourmetDan
Re: my post #1053

You post a definition that applies directly to the metaphysical nature of evolution and then merely pretend that it doesn't.

Your contention that evolution (and everything else) is metaphysical is itself metaphysical, and has nothing to do with the real world.

1,062 posted on 07/18/2006 9:00:32 AM PDT by Coyoteman (I love the sound of beta decay in the morning!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1058 | View Replies ]

To: GourmetDan
Or, Coyoteman, you could take his one-day course.
1,064 posted on 07/18/2006 9:13:41 AM PDT by LibertarianSchmoe ("...yeah, but, that's different!" - mating call of the North American Ten-Toed Hypocrite)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1058 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson