There's no way. Scientists have repeatedly demonstrated macroevolution--over and over again. And they've also given solid irrefutable fossil evidence of the same thing happening by random mutations in nature.
chirp chirp
There's no way. Scientists have repeatedly demonstrated macroevolution--over and over again. And they've also given solid irrefutable fossil evidence of the same thing happening by random mutations in nature.
chirp chirp
bookmark
bookmark
pingin' myself
It's about time - it's not like there's one missing link - all the links are missing between species.
While a lot of them support the theory of Global Warming.
It's gotten bigger!
"The statement, which includes endorsement by members of the prestigious U.S. National Academy of Sciences and Russian Academy of Sciences"
The RUSSIAN Academy of Sciences????
Perhaps Lysenko isn't dead after all. We KNOW we can get 600 "scientists" to sign a statement that your cars cause global warming, but that doesn't necessarily reflect scientific evidence or the consensus of MOST scientists.
Another World Net Daily article on the Discovery Institute is hardly news. Scientists, doctors, and engineers are people. It is possible to find all manner of obscure and minority viewpoints among them. That doesn't change the fact that the vast majority of people working in scientific and biological disciplines accept natural selection and descent with modification as being best explanation for the evidence we have. Both the fossil record and DNA analysis strongly support evolutionary theory, and our understanding of fossil evidence and DNA evidence is crosschecked with our understanding of other physical sciences such as physics and chemistry. To suggest that it is a theory on its last legs or facing serious opposition with scientific circles is disingenuous at best.