Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RayChuang88
The reason is simple: did the investigators find the blast pattern and remains of a MANPAD warhead anywhere on the plane? Given that each type of MANPAD has a distinct warhead detonation pattern (whether it's Stinger, SA-7, SA-18, Blowpipe, etc.), the fact that NONE of these blast patterns--let alone the explosive residue from the warhead itself--was found on the remains of TWA 800 rules out a missile attack.

This is why I am skeptical of the missile theory.

47 posted on 06/22/2006 8:40:40 AM PDT by frogjerk (LIBERALISM: The perpetual insulting of common sense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: frogjerk
This is why I am skeptical of the missile theory.

If they are trying to cover something up, why would they give you info that would prove a coverup? I have an advantage over you in that I was in the NYcity area when it happened and got news BEFORE the newsies and witnesses were shushed.

58 posted on 06/22/2006 8:47:38 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW (If you think you know what's coming next....You don't know Jack.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

To: frogjerk
The reason why I mentioned the lack of any blast patterns, finding warhead fragments or finding the explosives residue for the warhead is the fact that MANPAD missiles do their damage by impact, not a proximity blast like you get with radar-guided missiles. Since there are no signs of a warhead impact and explosion, there goes the missile shootdown theory.
79 posted on 06/22/2006 9:14:20 AM PDT by RayChuang88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson