To: PatrickHenry; RadioAstronomer
I have some arbitrary standards of my own
1. is the satellite's primary a star?
if no: it ain't a planet
if yes to 1 and 2:
2. Is the body essentially spherical?
if no: it ain't a planet
if yes:
3. does the body in question have sufficient gravity to maintain the stable orbit(s) of natural satellite(s) of its own?
if no: it ain't a planet
if yest to all the above: it IS a planet
93 posted on
06/22/2006 8:33:17 AM PDT by
King Prout
(many complain I am overly literal... this would not be a problem if fewer people were under-precise)
To: King Prout
if no: it ain't a planet
if yes to 1 and 2:
2. Is the body essentially spherical?
if no: it ain't a planet
if yes:
need more coffee...
94 posted on
06/22/2006 8:39:27 AM PDT by
King Prout
(many complain I am overly literal... this would not be a problem if fewer people were under-precise)
To: King Prout
does the body in question have sufficient gravity to maintain the stable orbit(s) of natural satellite(s) of its own? That depends on how far from the sun it is, which isn't really a good criterion.
104 posted on
06/22/2006 9:22:36 AM PDT by
steve-b
(Hoover Dam is every bit as "natural" as a beaver dam.)
To: King Prout
But, how would you rate Helen Thomas?
106 posted on
06/22/2006 9:34:03 AM PDT by
Skywarner
(The U.S. Armed Forces... Producers of FREEDOM for over 200 years!!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson