Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PatrickHenry; RadioAstronomer

I have some arbitrary standards of my own

1. is the satellite's primary a star?

if no: it ain't a planet
if yes to 1 and 2:

2. Is the body essentially spherical?

if no: it ain't a planet
if yes:

3. does the body in question have sufficient gravity to maintain the stable orbit(s) of natural satellite(s) of its own?

if no: it ain't a planet
if yest to all the above: it IS a planet


93 posted on 06/22/2006 8:33:17 AM PDT by King Prout (many complain I am overly literal... this would not be a problem if fewer people were under-precise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: King Prout
if no: it ain't a planet
if yes to 1 and 2:

2. Is the body essentially spherical?
if no: it ain't a planet
if yes:

need more coffee...

94 posted on 06/22/2006 8:39:27 AM PDT by King Prout (many complain I am overly literal... this would not be a problem if fewer people were under-precise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]

To: King Prout
does the body in question have sufficient gravity to maintain the stable orbit(s) of natural satellite(s) of its own?

That depends on how far from the sun it is, which isn't really a good criterion.

104 posted on 06/22/2006 9:22:36 AM PDT by steve-b (Hoover Dam is every bit as "natural" as a beaver dam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]

To: King Prout

But, how would you rate Helen Thomas?


106 posted on 06/22/2006 9:34:03 AM PDT by Skywarner (The U.S. Armed Forces... Producers of FREEDOM for over 200 years!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson