Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TexasPatriot8

"I said that if we hadn't wasted six years with these ridiculous multi-lateral "talks" and negotiations, this wouldn't be happening. This all proves that Bush is right and the only way to stop rogue terrorist nations like this from getting nukes and holding the world hostage with them is to strike first, destroying their nuclear weapons programs before they are producing completed weapons, like in Iraq."

That said, Bush is doing the same sort of timewasting Clinton did in Iran right now. He ain't so right he knows not to repeat the Clinton mistakes. That scares the crap out of me. Kim's goofy and his minions a little spooky, but Iran is full of inspired insaniacs. The longer we wait to blast Iran the longer we give them to get their nukes into the hands of these crazies.


108 posted on 06/19/2006 11:49:49 PM PDT by LibertarianInExile ('Is' and 'amnesty' both have clear, plain meanings. Are Billy Jeff, Pence, McQueeg & Bush related?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies ]


To: LibertarianInExile
That said, Bush is doing the same sort of timewasting Clinton did in Iran right now. He ain't so right he knows not to repeat the Clinton mistakes. That scares the crap out of me. Kim's goofy and his minions a little spooky, but Iran is full of inspired insaniacs. The longer we wait to blast Iran the longer we give them to get their nukes into the hands of these crazies.

Right
110 posted on 06/19/2006 11:52:37 PM PDT by garbageseeker (Gentleman, you can't fight in here, this is the War Room - Dr. Strangelove)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies ]

To: LibertarianInExile
Yeah but the thing is, all the talking the Bush administration is doing with Iran and North Korea is because the democrats and the UN are convinced that will work with them. I've never heard anyone in the administration say they really think talking and negotiating will work with Iran or North Korea. And if they fail, which it basically already has failed with North Korea, because of the lefts insistance on talks, it will be the fault of the liberals and the UN who insisted on unilateral talks.

It won't work blaming Bush for talking to long to North Korea or Iran, since it was the democrats who demanded talking instead of military action. And they can't have it both ways with the American voter. They said we should have talked to Iraq instead of using miliary action, and say we should use military action against Iran and North Korea instead of talking. Can't have it both ways. Talking did no good with Iraq for over a decade and 18 UN resolutions, and it will be that much of a dismal failure with Iran and North Korea. In the end, military action is the only real way to deal with those kinds of despots with nuclear weapons programs. They like to talk because to them, talk gives them time to finish their programs. And like in North Korea, they have nukes now because the liberals insisted Bush talk to them. Iraq definitely doesn't have nukes because Bush did it his way. The liberal way just doesn't work. Multi-lateral talks and negotiations with people like that is just a more diplomatic way of saying "wait and see". And if history has taught us anything, it's that "wait and see"ers will get you had every time. I refer to those before Pearl Harbor who predicted that attack, and went ignored, and in the case of General Mitchell, was run out of the Army because he so strongly pushed the idea of a Pearl Harbor attack, after a simulated attack against the Panama Canal using the Langly and old bi-planes.

120 posted on 06/20/2006 12:33:57 AM PDT by TexasPatriot8 (You can't get blood from a turnip, and with liberals, you can't get common sense from stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson