Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: robertpaulsen
You took my statement and tried to counter it by choosing one area, marijuana arrests, and saying there was no correlation.

1. We were discussing mj arrests and use. 2. I showed that there was indeed a positive correlation: more arrests positively correlates with more use.

Now, let's use your numbers from 1996-2004: there is still a positive correlation between more arrests and more mj use.

309 posted on 06/21/2006 1:55:13 PM PDT by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 307 | View Replies ]


To: Ken H
"Now, let's use your numbers from 1996-2004: there is still a positive correlation between more arrests and more mj use."

More arrests? Yes. A higher percentage? No.

With a public policy of marijuana arrests as the lowest priority (and the percentage of arrests did drop), there is a perception of a lower perceived risk. The number of users increased. The number of arrests increased, yes, but did not keep pace.

311 posted on 06/21/2006 2:40:05 PM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 309 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson