Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PatrickHenry
...situations where someone files a civil rights case and the other side promptly does what is being demanded, so there's no case left to try. The plaintiff's (possibly ACLU) lawyers still want to get paid, saying that but for them, the "abuses" would have continued. Some cases hold that no fees are appropriate in such situations.

Just curious: can a judge refuse to allow the defendent to make it right before judgement in a situation where they could turn around and reinstate the policy a week later?

55 posted on 06/18/2006 9:09:16 AM PDT by js1138 (Well I say there are some things we don't want to know! Important things!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]


To: js1138
Just curious: can a judge refuse to allow the defendent to make it right before judgement in a situation where they could turn around and reinstate the policy a week later?

I doubt very much that the case would have become moot, even if the board had dropped their policy. But I'm not certain of this. It's tricky stuff. Anyway, the original board were too crazy to entertain such a notion.

58 posted on 06/18/2006 10:33:21 AM PDT by PatrickHenry (Unresponsive to trolls, lunatics, fanatics, retards, scolds, & incurable ignoramuses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson