They are self-evidently ridiculous viewpoints from the standpoint of reason and evidence. This isn't.
They are self-evidently ridiculous viewpoints from the standpoint of reason and evidence. This isn't.ID mastermind Behe said (in the Dover trial) that Astrology would be scientific under his revised definition, so I dunno about them being "self-evidently ridiculous". That is, unless ID also is "self-evidently ridiculous" as science (my take on it).