"corrupt" to implement a policy that one believes to be constitutional, just because courts have said otherwise?
Would you bend over for everything the lunatic courts say?
I'm sure glad your type wasn't predominant at the time of the American Revolution, pal.
"corrupt" to implement a policy that one believes to be constitutional, just because courts have said otherwise?
Would you bend over for everything the lunatic courts say?
I'm sure glad your type wasn't predominant at the time of the American Revolution, pal.
They knew it was un-Constitutional, or they wouldn't have felt compelled to hide their true intentions.
If they honestly believed the policy they were implementing would pass Constitutional muster, they would have been proud to reveal it. Instead, they used denials, lies and subterfuge. Their actions tell us all we need to know - hiding speaks to a guilty heart.
And as for comparing this to the American Revolution, that's just silly. The Founding Fathers never had to lie. They had the courage of their convictions, and they knew they were right. The Founders didn't have to lie to sneak independence through while steadfastly deny they were doing it.
I'm always disappointed at the number of Freepers who are willing to excuse, or overlook, lying. Just so long as the lies are in the service of a political goal you like, right?