"those widows... are not to be criticized in any way since they are 'grieving widows'."
That is the Dems' unstated premise, which Ann exposes.
That they "enjoyed" some benefits of their misfortune, such as becoming millionaires, being followed by paparazzi, appeared in magazines, TV, etc., pierces the veil of absolute victimization, and allows for their arguments to be engaged by a competing voice. Their opinions should not be beyond reproach.
Well, why should we expect otherwise since the whole of the dimbulbs' philosophy is centered squarely upon the concept of victimhood? They never advance beyond being a victim. Regardless of the outcome, the dims want the persons involved to never rise above their circumstances and remain unable to move on. Take this very thread topic. The dims don't want the NJ4 to ever be anything other than grieving widows. And they use that to discredit Coulter's book. RATs are disgusting...