Yes, I was thinking about this as I drove home from work, and I think I could evaluate this fairly since I am unwilling to approve of Ann Coulter's tactics in spite of the fact that she's on my side.
How can you evaluate AC's word fairly if you haven't read the book?
The book is a polemic which uses hyperbole to make a direct assault on the doctrine of liberal infallibility.
That you priggishly dismiss her words as not "rational discourse" shows only your ignorance of this particular type of discourse. Your claim that AC supporters "quibble" about the meaning of the word "enjoying," fades when you beg your question that enjoy could only mean some sly invective on her part. You compound your argument's (such as it is) weakness by superciliously denouncing the proofs presented to you, then risibly claim you can evaluate her work fairly.
I'm not going to question your motives, (tho you seem quite comfortable to do that to others) but while you may consider yourself to be a conservative, you certainly don't sound like one.
In anticipation of your "gosh these AC supporter are so mean" declamation: see tagline.