Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: khnyny
Whatever happened to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of l964.

Smith's right to express his religious views is protected by law.

Graham, another member of the board attacked him based on those religious beliefs.

Homosexuality is not protected. Nor is Smith's characterization of it as sexually deviant, an inaccurate statement. Graham is welcome to consider it hurtful, that doesn't make it inaccurate, nor does it give him the right to violate the law.

Smith should be reinstated. Graham should be fired. Ehrlich and Graham should be sued.

Smith doesn't appear to have violated the law, and his comments are protected by the law.

Graham and Ehrlich appear to have violated the law. This one needs to be taken to the courts.

45 posted on 06/16/2006 10:36:56 AM PDT by untrained skeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: untrained skeptic

You mean this Title VII:

http://www.eeoc.gov/policy/vii.html


52 posted on 06/16/2006 10:43:11 AM PDT by khnyny (Never in the field of human conflict was so much owed by so many to so few.- Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

To: untrained skeptic

Yeah, but the law is in the hands of judges who hate Christianity. The judges give or take away rights.


89 posted on 06/16/2006 2:08:52 PM PDT by pravknight (Liberalism under the guise of magisterial teaching is still heresy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson