The post I was responding to said:Specifically, Canadians could attack and could be critical of American policy but, they will not tolerate any negative comment about there own situation.
You made this claim.
I asked you to show me where in my posting history you could find anything to back up this accusation.
Now you reverse yourself, and say if I had attacked American policy, it would be OK with you.
It is okay to be critical of policy.
These circular arguments of yours are becoming tiresome.
"These circular arguments of yours are becoming tiresome."
I think your right.
Your posting something implying it is a statement I made rather than pointing out it was a statement made to me. In addition, the comment was generic. I did not think it was about you in the particular, but possibly it may have applied to you in the general. So, you ask me to research to determine if it applies to you in the particular and I, frankly, just don't understand the purpose of the exercise. If you have a need to say something, say it. I will respond as best I can. But, I have no desire to dispute that which I am not able to follow.