Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: spetznaz
My 2 centavos: If you currently have a DVD upconvert player (1080i) with HDMI out and optical audio, I wouldn't bother, at least not at current or expected prices for a couple of years. Theoretically, native picture quality would be better for DVD's mastered in HD (rather than digitally-enhanced), but most people would be hard-pressed to notice a difference without a side-by-side comparison). Maybe you'd see it on Lord of the Rings, but as for most earlier films, not likely worth it.
27 posted on 06/16/2006 10:05:19 AM PDT by andy58-in-nh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: andy58-in-nh

Well, I may be biased since I've been watching hi-def movies and TV for almost the last year by way of digital cable, but I think the difference between even anamorphic widescreen DVD and true hi-def is clear to anyone with eyes. The detail level is just that much higher - high enough in some cases to reveal the limitations of the original film media. Also colours are better rendered in the hi def format, and more realistic. I'm not really a videophile, but I think anyone can appreciate a better quality picture. I mean, how many of the people reading this are still using a VGA (640x480) video card and monitor? And it definitely becomes noticeable when you go to large screen sizes, which are increasingly common. Everyone says the same thing: once you've seen a movie or sports on a decent sized hi-def screen (with a true hi-def feed), you don't want to go back.


30 posted on 06/16/2006 10:18:10 AM PDT by -YYZ-
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson