"Coulter is not effective for anything or any one except her own enrichment."
There you go again.
You don't know Coulter. You don't know her history.
But you think if you repeat this lie often enough people will believe it.
You take the high road all right.
BTW, speaking of greed, few mention that the "Jersey Girls" only formed because they were unhappy with the original $15 billion victims' compensation fund. They said the package was arbitrary and unfair.
It was only after they got their takes bumped up $200,000 to $1.85 million each that they decided they should find out what caused 9/11 to happen.
And when they didn't get the answer they wanted (Bush) they screamed cover up.
But man, that Ann Coulter is greedy!
To which you replied: "There you go again. You don't know Coulter. You don't know her history." You call the above a lie, and obliquely suggest that what I mean by it is that she's greedy. At that shows is that you don't get what I'm saying.
Coulter's antics do not benefit the conservative cause in any way. True, she has plenty of fans on the right because she says what many people wish they had the chance to say. She is a hero to many on the right in the same way, and for the same reasons that James Carville is a hero to many on the left.
Both Coulter and Carville have built lucrative careers on their ascerbic personnas and hyper-partisanship. To note their success and methods is neither a lie, nor the same as saying they are greedy. Get it?