No, actually it wasn't. You can keep twisting my words if you want, but I was asking ORIGINALLY about your point on Dr. Parker, NOT your pro-gay agenda. Oops, you don't know what a "gay agenda" is, so never mind about that. You claimed that the stories were "distorted" in Dr. Parker's favor, and I was attempting to find out on what you were basing that on other than opposing his anti-gay agenda stance. Oh wait, since you don't know what a "gay agenda" is, you must not know what an "anti gay-agenda" person stands for, or stands against, which makes your bias toward him even more puzzling.
I don't know what more Dr. Parker should have or shouldn't have done. It probably depends on the severity of the physical abuse his son suffered and what he could prove. Unless you have spoken to him personally, I'm not sure how you would know what he has done or hasn't done. For example, do you know for a fact that he hasn't spoken with the police? If so, how do you know that?
Uh, I checked it out with other sources. For example, the police chief says no one has filed any complaint nor are they investigating any. The school board president says all this is new to him. His lawyer says the kid wasn't injured, just shaken up a bit. So it's safe to say that something's a tad fishy with the story.
Quick update for you. The ping list has now set up a solicitation for money for Mr. Parker on another thread. Now the story is beginning to make some sense. Timing is pretty good, I'd say.