As I indicated on this thread, I am a newbie to the Intelligent Design - Darwin Controversies and so it wil take me some time to gain my footing.
However, the cursory familiarity I have with the subject indicates to me the labelling, name-calling, appeals to authority, etc etc does not speak well of those defending Darwin.
That's what happens when a senior fellow is a Moonie
LOL Well, that's a scientific put-down of the first order
You already have the knowledge of opposition points that Bill Dembski and Ann Coulter do. That's the good news.
The bad news is that you will probably be in the same position a year from now.