Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush sneaking North American super-state without oversight?
WorldNet Daily ^ | June 13, 2006 | Jerome Corsi

Posted on 06/13/2006 6:08:39 AM PDT by conservativecorner

Despite having no authorization from Congress, the Bush administration has launched extensive working-group activity to implement a trilateral agreement with Mexico and Canada.

The membership of the working groups has not been published, nor has their work product been disclosed, despite two years of massive effort within the executive branches of the U.S., Mexico and Canada.

The groups, working under the North American Free Trade Association office in the Department of Commerce, are to implement the Security and Prosperity Partnership, or SPP, signed by President Bush, Mexican President Vicente Fox and then-Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin in Waco, Texas, on March 23, 2005.

This trilateral agreement, signed as a joint declaration not submitted to Congress for review, led to the creation of the SPP office within the Department of Commerce.

The SPP report to the heads of state of the U.S., Mexico and Canada, -- released June 27, 2005, -- lists some 20 different working groups spanning a wide variety of issues ranging from e-commerce, to aviation policy, to borders and immigration, involving the activity of multiple U.S. government agencies.

The working groups have produced a number of memorandums of understanding and trilateral declarations of agreement.

The Canadian government and the Mexican government each have SPP offices comparable to the U.S. office.

Geri Word, who heads the SPP office within the NAFTA office of the U.S. Department of Commerce affirmed to WND last Friday in a telephone interview that the membership of the working groups, as well as their work products, have not been published anywhere, including on the Internet.

Why the secrecy?

"We did not want to get the contact people of the working groups distracted by calls from the public," said Word.

She suggested to WND that the work products of the working groups was described on the SPP website, so publishing the actual documents did not seem required.

WND can find no specific congressional legislation authorizing the SPP working groups. The closest to enabling legislation was introduced in the Senate by Sen. Richard Lugar, R-Ind., on April 20, 2005. Listed as S. 853, the bill was titled "North American Cooperative Security Act: A bill to direct the Secretary of State to establish a program to bolster the mutual security and safety of the United States, Canada, and Mexico, and for other purposes." The bill never emerged from the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.

In the House of Representatives, the same bill was introduced by Rep. Katherine Harris, R-Fla., on May 26, 2005. Again, the bill languished in the House Subcommittee on Intelligence, Information Sharing, and Terrorism Risk Assessment.

WND cannot find any congressional committees taking charge for specific oversight of SPP activity.

WND has requested from Word in the U.S. Department of Commerce a complete listing of the contact persons and the participating membership for the working groups listed in the June 2005 SPP report to the trilateral leaders. In addition, WND asked to see all work products, such as memorandums of understanding, letters of intent, and trilateral agreements that are referenced in the report.

Many SPP working groups appear to be working toward achieving specific objectives as defined by a May 2005 Council on Foreign Relations task force report, which presented a blueprint for expanding the SPP agreement into a North American Union that would merge the U.S., Canada and Mexico into a new governmental form.

Referring to the SPP joint declaration, the report, entitled "Building a North American Community," stated:

The Task Force is pleased to provide specific advice on how the partnership can be pursued and realized.

To that end, the Task Force proposes the creation by 2010 of a North American community to enhance security, prosperity, and opportunity. We propose a community based on the principle affirmed in the March 2005 Joint Statement of the three leaders that "our security and prosperity are mutually dependent and complementary." Its boundaries will be defined by a common external tariff and an outer security perimeter within which the movement of people, products, and capital will be legal, orderly, and safe. Its goal will be to guarantee a free, secure, just, and prosperous North America.

The CFR task force report called for establishment of a common security border perimeter around North America by 2010, along with free movement of people, commerce and capital within North America, facilitated by the development of a North American Border Pass that would replace a U.S. passport for travel between the U.S., Canada and Mexico.

Also envisioned by the CFR task force report were a North American court, a North American inter-parliamentary group, a North American executive commission, a North American military defense command, a North American customs office and a North American development bank.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: agenda; aheadinsandcantsee; americansellout; americo; amishdude; anewworldorderbush1; bildabetterbooger; blackhelicopters; bush; bushbash; bushbots; bushlovesfoxie; chickenlittle; corsi; cuespookymusic; cwojackson; duplicate; globalistsundermybed; ignrmanbehndcurtan; immigration; kookism; kooks; koolaid; lugar; morethorazineplease; namericanunion; nobordersnonation; northamericanunion; notthiscrapagain; paranoia; pitchforkers; preciousbodilyfluids; prosperity; spp; stupidhideheadinsand; tariff; tariffs; theboogeyman; tinfoil; tinfoilhats; trustmenotyoureyes; truthhurtsstupid; whirlednutdaily; wnd; worldnutdaily; yomomaundermybed
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 321-340 next last
To: cripplecreek
In a world without borders the laws have to mesh and I doubt that means the rest of the world will gain free speech or gun ownership. Quite the opposite I'm afraid.

Exactly my point in post #124.

141 posted on 06/13/2006 9:03:43 AM PDT by Rockitz (This isn't rocket science- Follow the money and you'll find the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: Diddle E. Squat

And it's also populated by those useful idiots who swallow every bit of politically correct rhetoric and propaganda hook, line and enchilada. I'm sure you probably believe the crap about Mexicans just wanting to come here and work (when they cost us tens of billions in welfare expenses), that Fox just wants an "orderly movement of people" (when we see the borders overrun with any # of rapists, murderers and drug dealers) and businesses need to hire Mexicans to do the "jobs Americans won't do" (the perfect cover story for American businessmen who want to evade payroll taxes as well as pay minimal wages to Mexican workers because they know taxpayers will be stuck with other employee living expenses.

The point is a small % of those shipments coming in from Mexico and overseas will even be checked by customs and what better way to distribute drugs and other contraband across the whole country than by having an inland port right in middle America.


142 posted on 06/13/2006 9:07:08 AM PDT by american spirit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: LachlanMinnesota

Part of Article VI of the Constitution:

This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any state to the Contrary notwithstanding.

Does this clause place treaties on the same level with the constitution as the "supreme Law of the Land?" If so, does it not follow that there can be treaties which are inconsistent with the constitutional terms?

My concern is that a president will enter into a treaty, and 2/3 of the Senate will ratify it, an it will erode our constitutional rights. Has this issue been dealt with in the context of treaties which, for example, provide for trials that do not include our constitutional rights?

I am concerned that the various trade agreements made or to be made in the furre will be the route by which our national life is irreparably harmed.


143 posted on 06/13/2006 9:08:07 AM PDT by LachlanMinnesota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude

I see the cow dung fumes must've gotten to you.

Don't you have some hay to bale or something?


144 posted on 06/13/2006 9:08:14 AM PDT by sauropod ("Heaven on my left, Hell on my right and the Angel of Death behind me" - Dune)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: zeaal

I would suspect under this new alliance many of our rights would be trampled because the bill of rights is deemed too ancient to be of any use. People just laugh and laugh at this but tell me, the Elites that have pushed the EU through even though people have rejected it, it is highly probable that North America has elites of this mindset as well.


145 posted on 06/13/2006 9:12:13 AM PDT by Xenophon450 ("Study the past, if you would divine the future." - Confucius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Rockitz
The overarching truth is, in their worldview, it's a world of business and sovereign nations only serve to restrict business operations and ultimately, profits. Who needs borders? Free trade, cheap labor, and open borders for all! Yep, they're all one world government whores sold out to their big business constituents. That's the only explanation that is consistent with their actions over the last 20 years. In truth, they've all sold us down the river for big business and a one world government which will benefit.... you guessed it.... big business.

I strongly agree with you. Our political leaders in both parties and in both the executive and legislative branches have prostituted themselves to global business conglomerates, to the detriment of freedom and health of this nation and its citizens. All for the idolatrous worship of the almighty dollar. Anything for a buck.

146 posted on 06/13/2006 9:17:11 AM PDT by OB1kNOb (This is no time for bleeding hearts, pacifists, and appeasers to prevail in free world opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: OB1kNOb

Here's the rub though: the so-called western "elites": the oligarchs, the greedheads, and the dreamers, are going to be relegated to the dustbin of history (where most of them belong) by coming world events in the years ahead.


147 posted on 06/13/2006 9:20:52 AM PDT by jpl (Victorious warriors win first, then go to war; defeated warriors go to war first, then seek to win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: sauropod
Glancing at the asinine keywords, there appear to be lots of ostriches here.

It's easier for them to be ostriches than to accept the idea that the current occupant of the White House could be involved in such treachery against American workers/taxpayers. To many of them, he's a god who can do no wrong.

148 posted on 06/13/2006 9:21:32 AM PDT by janetgreen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: MikefromOhio

You would think Kofi would have enough baggage of his own.


149 posted on 06/13/2006 9:26:22 AM PDT by AmishDude (Everybody loves AmishDude)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: Smokin' Joe

That's right, the Neeeeeewwwwww World Order.


150 posted on 06/13/2006 9:29:02 AM PDT by AmishDude (Everybody loves AmishDude)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: LachlanMinnesota
I think that the US will do by treaties what it could not do by constitutional amendments, all approved by the Senate, that will gradually erode our counstitutional rights. We will never be allowed to vote on this "Burkean accretions" which erode our rights.

Which explains why the House is at a complete 180 with the Senate on illegal immigration. The corporations know exactly who they have to buy off to ram their agenda through.

151 posted on 06/13/2006 9:29:02 AM PDT by Rockitz (This isn't rocket science- Follow the money and you'll find the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: LachlanMinnesota
You mean there is an organization!

With people in it!

And they have opinions!!!

It must be a conspiracy.

152 posted on 06/13/2006 9:29:48 AM PDT by AmishDude (Everybody loves AmishDude)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: houeto

Oh, no. You've found out the secret. The Trilateral Commission is -- gasp! -- an organization. Of people. With opinions. Lock the doors, Mabel.


153 posted on 06/13/2006 9:31:02 AM PDT by AmishDude (Everybody loves AmishDude)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: MikefromOhio

And a working group is?


154 posted on 06/13/2006 9:31:08 AM PDT by hedgetrimmer ("I'm a millionaire thanks to the WTO and "free trade" system--Hu Jintao top 10 worst dictators)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: LachlanMinnesota
Didn't read it. You mean someone issued a report? And the CFR was in on it? Well, that proves it right there. The whole world is going to be conquered by that cabal.

Doesn't it?

155 posted on 06/13/2006 9:32:51 AM PDT by AmishDude (Everybody loves AmishDude)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: jpl
Here's the rub though: the so-called western "elites": the oligarchs, the greedheads, and the dreamers, are going to be relegated to the dustbin of history (where most of them belong) by coming world events in the years ahead.

True. When it all gets resolved. However, in the meantime, it grieves me because in their demise, they'll take a lot of naive followers down with them that swallowed their vision of grandeur... hook, line, and sinker.

156 posted on 06/13/2006 9:34:47 AM PDT by OB1kNOb (This is no time for bleeding hearts, pacifists, and appeasers to prevail in free world opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: sauropod
I see the cow dung fumes must've gotten to you.

As a matter of fact, I have not been affected by your posts, no.

157 posted on 06/13/2006 9:35:01 AM PDT by AmishDude (Everybody loves AmishDude)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: janetgreen
I was an ostrich about the mysterious Neeeewwwww World Order. How's that coming along? Poppy Bush let the whole conspiracy slip in a speech. (People said he was talking about the post Communism world, but we know better.) I mean, it's been over 15 years and no progress.

I guess they've had to go a different route.

I wish one of these conspiracies would take hold already. I want in on the ground floor.

158 posted on 06/13/2006 9:37:29 AM PDT by AmishDude (Everybody loves AmishDude)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: P.O.E.

P.O.E. wrote:


> The ultimate conspiracy theory - out in the open because no-one will believes conspiracies. <


Yes, the situation is almost exactly parallel to what the John Birch Society taught us so wisely about the Communists:

The more evidence one finds that somebody isn't a Communist, the more one can be sure that the person in question actually IS a Communist -- because Communists are so devilishly clever.

So for example, the fact that Gen. Dwight D. Eisenhower never seemed to be a Communist is dispositive that he actually was. Q.E.D.

[Or at least that's how I remember the proof.]

And now that I think about it, was Eisenhower a secret member of the Bilderbergers?

[Oops, gotta run. A black helicopter just landed in my front yard.]


159 posted on 06/13/2006 9:39:19 AM PDT by Hawthorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude
I want in on the ground floor.

No surprise at all.

160 posted on 06/13/2006 9:40:09 AM PDT by janetgreen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 321-340 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson