But some women like to post much about child rape, crime and punishment (posts before the tantrums). In certain feminist circles, participants frequently heat themselves into a rage with such discussions.
- - - -
True enough.
But I think there's a particular slant, perspective when they do which is not this kid's.
It would be strange, though, for a "kid" to post so many articles about child molestation cases and complain about lax treatment of offenders just before posting the vulgar, childish-looking spam. He or she even complained in the later obscene posts about being banned for posting the previous rage rants and duplicates about the issue. One of the posts just before the spam started was an extremely long list of links to news stories about molestation cases with a complaint from the poster about prison terms being too short. The user was banned for that post and immediately proceded to post the morbid, vulgar spam.
And, IMO, many DV advocates commonly exhibit outbursts like those we've seen here. Quite a few of them are known to have come from disfunctional families and to have been drawn to the work by their own experiences.
Dr. Richard Gelles shut down a discussion on DV during the '90s, because advocates (social workers, psychologists, lawyers and others) got out of hand. ...but not before a lawyer and a judge among them were successfully sued for their false allegations and threats against family rights advocates. Gelles formally concluded a research report done by him and his assistants then, that feminist research and reports were subjective and biased. It was the turning point in his studies.
;-)
BTW, subpoenas can issued for ISP records to reveal individuals behind IP addresses at given times. If the offenses/damages we've seen persisted enough to constitute a hassle, the antagonist will be known in time.