To: MinorityRepublican
31 years of service is actually 11 more years than required for retirement, not 1 as the article indicates.
26 posted on
06/10/2006 5:21:10 AM PDT by
Boris99
To: Boris99
31 years of service is actually 11 more years than required for retirement, not 1 as the article indicates. I was going to point that out as well. Consider the lamestream media source.
27 posted on
06/10/2006 5:50:15 AM PDT by
Looking4Truth
(Radical muslims and illegal immigrants: One group wants to kill U.S and the other invade U.S.)
To: Boris99; Looking4Truth
31 years of service is actually 11 more years than required for retirement, not 1 as the article indicates. At 30 years you're eleigible for the max pension of 75% of your base salary. Continued service past that point results in no increase in pension benefits. I believe that's what they are referring to.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson