Replies

" I posted the conclusion of the editorial exactly as it appears. "

Besides your self-serving quote being grossly out of context, what part of it's not a legitimate "Editorial" - as I also thoroughly substantiated in my post #77 - are you refusing to comprehend ???

Aside from the obvious fact that it's still merely one man's opinion!

Interesting that you place more weight on the views of an msm hack of who knows what sexual orientation and pushing who knows what agenda over the reasoned opinion/conclusion of myself; a known long-time & hopefully knowledgeable conservative activist.

Why not 'fess up?
In your desperation to make whatever point, you tried to slip one by & got caught.

"In your desperation to make whatever point, you tried to slip one by & got caught."

I am not sure I understand the editorial point your making. Are you saying, when the editor of the editorial page writes on the editorial page it is not editorial commentary. Please explain.

As I said before, you said that you believed that the chances of reversing the gay marriage regulation would get better in the future. The commentary, on the other hand, clearly states the opposite opinion.