[spatso]

"The reality is that whether it be Canada, the United States, Britain, Australia or any western nation, gay people will soon have access to what is called "civil union". Anyone who cannot live with this might have to seek political asylum in Iran."

I don't disagree. Civil unions don't bother me, although I think marriage should be between a man and a women. Having said that, my issue is very simple. Why are you guys starting threads on the story about the gay mounties less than a week after the story breaks on homegrown terrorism?

[Fair Go]

This thread was not posted by a Canadian Freeper but by someone from Virginia. As I see it the Canadian Freepers don't want to see their new conservative government distracted by the issue of gay marriages and defeated on the floor of parliament before it has had a chance to show what it can do and thereby convert a minority to a majority at the next election. This makes great sense.
However, I agree with your stance on civil unions.

[Dialup Llama]

marriage should be between a man and a women

Hate to get too technical here. Not only should two men not marry but in fact two men CANNOT marry. The reason is that two men cannot have sex. Human reproductive anatomy doesnt match up that way. Whatever two men do, it is NOT sex. Two men can only simulate sex and simulate marriage.

[fanfan]

Why are you guys starting threads on the story about the gay mounties less than a week after the story breaks on homegrown terrorism?

Your post # 13 on this thread about terrorists in Canada first introduced your "issue" with gay Mounties.

It was politely suggested to you at post # 26 and 28, that if you wanted to discuss this issue, you should post a story about the gay Mounties yourself.

Now that an American has posted a thread on the subject, your twisted logic gives us this statement:

Having said that, my issue is very simple. Why are you guys starting threads on the story about the gay mounties less than a week after the story breaks on homegrown terrorism?

Your issue?

You might be right that this is your issue, as you haven't posted on any other threads but these two since the 8th of June.

On the other hand I think you have more than one issue.

I believe you have, as they say, Issues.

From post # 90, on this thread, we find this exchange:

Fair Go said "This thread was not posted by a Canadian Freeper but by someone from Virginia."

You said I am not sure what to say. If it is true, my primary criticism is answered and, therefore, I may have been error to press some of the points that I made. On the other hand, most of the general observations I made still stand.

I am not sure what to say.

How about "I was wrong. I apologize"?

If it is true, my primary criticism is answered and, therefore, I may have been error to press some of the points that I made.

IF it is true

IF?

Check for your self!

Of course, being a newbie, you probably don't know how.

Why don't you crawl back under whatever rock you lived under before you joined Free Republic, and leave the discussions to the adults.

I'm still waiting for your answer regarding what area of the world you live in.