Coulter writes a book trashing Godless liberals (implying that she is God-filled), then makes these hateful remarks about these women.
Coulter is using God in the same way Robert Tilton uses God: to pad her pockets.
Yup, which is exactly why I said she needs to temper her remarks.
There is enough ammo at Breitweisters blog to skewer her as an opportunist and a left wing loon, the conjecture about something Ann Coulter knows nothing about broke the bounds of common deceny. That's where I come down and as you know full well, I don't give a sh^t what anyone thinks about it.
Sinkspur, you need to get some religion!
I firmly believe that Ann Coulter is sincere in her love for the Lord. And I still say that she says things the rest of us wish we had the nerve to say.
I don't believe that it's "cruel" to put panties on the heads of misogynists and I don't believe it's "cruel" to speculate on the marriages these women have already shamelessly dragged into the public arena - marriages as weapons in the political arena, no less.
Her point is not that one liberal or another is an atheist; her point is that liberalism is an atheistic cosmology.The Constitutiton, BTW, is not atheistic but agnostic, not allowing that any group has the authority of received wisdom.
Coulter does not argue, so far as I can tell, from the assumption of her own holiness - she argues from the philosophical perspective that she wants holiness (just as the philosopher argues from the perspective of wanting wisdom, not from the assumption that s/he already is wise.
It appears to me to be objective fact that political liberals reject any truth apart for how things look on TV. To whatever extent that is so, journalists are their gods.