To: pissant
I personally think she is better when she is attacking liberal sacred cows in the idea arena, not the personal arena. That is why the converting Muslims to Christianity remark worked, and this doesn't.
IMO, by attacking the health of their personal relationships, she lost an opportunity to attack what they said and how they behave. She could have done that very effectively.
BTW, not only are they no better off than any other moonbat...they ARE moonbats. But that has nothing to do with the state of their marriages. (Please note: the namecalling in my previous statement is commentary on their ideas, not their persons. )
To: pollyannaish
Well, if you read Ann's work much, she attacks not only the ideas, but also the individuals, very harshly.
If you are telling me the comments were not necessary, I'd agree. Nothing Ann or 95% of other pundits say is necessary. She is trying to sell books. And being outrageous is her schtick and has been since day one. Her reply to Hillary today was classic. And downright mean.
286 posted on
06/07/2006 6:43:24 PM PDT by
pissant
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson