[ahayes]

How do we know they weren't planning on killing their husbands? How do we know they didn't eat their newborn babies? How do we know they don't sacrifice black cats to Satan in their basements?

That nonsense is just baseless slander.

[RobRoy]

>>How do we know they weren't planning on killing their husbands? How do we know they didn't eat their newborn babies? How do we know they don't sacrifice black cats to Satan in their basements?

That nonsense is just baseless slander.<<

No, what it is is bringing into question just how negatively impacted they were by their husbands deaths. She is trying to amplify and expand the context in which their political activity took place. She is saying we really don't know where they are coming from and should be reticent to be impacted by anything they said, yet many people took their stories and "sincerity" hook, line and sinker.

[true_blue_texican]

...That nonsense is just baseless slander....

Hey, ahayes, there are baseless slanders and then there are slanders based in hyperbole. These ladies were faaaaarrrrr more focused on Bush and their TV appearences WHERE THEY DID NOT FOCUS on their husbands. Think of George Costanza using his dead fiance to get dates.