Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Coulter calls 9/11 widows "witches" (Lying Headline from Reuters)
Reuters via Yahoo! News ^ | June 7, 2006 | Claudia Parsons

Posted on 06/07/2006 4:51:37 PM PDT by new yorker 77

Conservative author Ann Coulter sparked a storm on Wednesday after describing a group of September 11 widows who backed the Democratic Party as millionaire "witches" reveling in their status as celebrities.

"I've never seen people enjoying their husbands' deaths so much," Coulter writes in her book "Godless: The Church of Liberalism," published on Tuesday, referring to four women who headed a campaign that resulted in the creation of the September 11 Commission that investigated the hijacked plane attacks.

Coulter wrote that the women were millionaires as a result of compensation settlements and were "reveling in their status as celebrities and stalked by grief-arazzis."

A spokeswoman for publisher Crown Forum said it had set a first print run of 1 million copies of "Godless" and there were 1.5 million copies of Coulter's previous four books in print.

The four women, Kristen Breitweiser, Patty Casazza, Mindy Kleinberg and Lorie Van Auken, declined to discuss the book in detail but issued a statement saying they had been slandered.

"There was no joy in watching men that we loved burn alive. There was no happiness in telling our children that their fathers were never coming home again," said the statement signed by the four, along with a fifth woman, Monica Gabrielle.

The four women, who live in or around East Brunswick, New Jersey, became friends after September 11 and formed a group that agitated for the investigation. "Our only motivation ever was to make our nation safer," they said.

Coulter, whose books include the bestseller "How to Talk to a Liberal (If You Must)," argues in the new book the women she dubs "the Witches of East Brunswick" wanted to blame President George W. Bush for not preventing the attacks.

She criticized them for making a campaign advertisement for Democratic presidential candidate Sen. John Kerry in 2004, and added: "By the way, how do we know their husbands weren't planning to divorce these harpies? Now that their shelf life is dwindling, they'd better hurry up and appear in Playboy."

PERSONAL ATTACKS

Asked by Reuters why she made such personal comments, Coulter said by e-mail, "I am tired of victims being used as billboards for untenable liberal political beliefs."

"A lot of Americans have been seething over the inanities of these professional victims for some time," she added.

Democratic Sen. Frank Lautenberg (news, bio, voting record) of New Jersey said Coulter's "shameless attack" on the widows sparked disgust. "Her bookselling antics and accompanying vulgarity deserve our deepest contempt," he said in a statement.

The New York Post, owned by Rupert Murdoch's News. Corp., slammed the comments in an article on Wednesday headlined: "Righty writer Coulter hurls nasty gibes at 9/11 gals."

Coulter, a regular television commentator who is hugely popular among some conservatives, was challenged on NBC's "Today" show on Tuesday over what host Matt Lauer called "dramatic" remarks, prompting her to say, "You are getting testy with me."

Coulter is known for a combative column after September 11 saying, "We should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity." In one book, she wrote, "Even Islamic terrorists don't hate America like liberals do."

Her latest comments were quoted on radio stations in New York on Wednesday and the book was the subject of debate on Web sites such as www.salon.com. The Daily News newspaper's front-page headline was "Coulter the Cruel."

The controversy appeared to be doing no harm to sales of Coulter's latest book, which was listed as the second-best seller of the day at online retailer Amazon.com on Wednesday afternoon.

Copyright © 2006 Reuters Limited. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Reuters content is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Reuters. Reuters shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.

Copyright © 2006 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: anncoulter; coulter; godless; ladyann; widows
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 361-380381-400401-420 ... 601-602 next last
To: flaglady47

When you shoot from the hip, you tend to blow off a few of your own toes if you don't do it right.

She is not my cup of tea, and I think she hurts the conservative cause more than she helps it. Cheap theatrics are no way to discuss politics.


381 posted on 06/07/2006 8:02:30 PM PDT by Central Scrutiniser ("You can't really dust for vomit.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 377 | View Replies]

To: flaglady47
Ann cuts through all of that and slays them with clarity.

Oh yes, clarity like:

"By the way, how do we know their husbands weren't planning to divorce these harpies? Now that their shelf life is dwindling, they'd better hurry up and appear in Playboy."

Clarity? I call that muddying and effing things up. She couldn't back that cheap-shot up if her life depended on it. She lost credibility, big-time.

382 posted on 06/07/2006 8:03:02 PM PDT by KJC1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 377 | View Replies]

To: flaglady47

AMEN AMEN AMEN AMEN AMEN. I don't care what she said about anybody who is against, our security,undermines our war.
And who is encouraged by code pink moonbats, and democRats to push the liberal agenda.


383 posted on 06/07/2006 8:09:12 PM PDT by highway 90 west (god bless texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 373 | View Replies]

To: KJC1
Everyone was talking about Clinton's BJ too.

Correct, and HE didn't screw up. Meaning he suffered nothing for it. Ann and conservatism will suffer nothing for her stinging remarks.
384 posted on 06/07/2006 8:10:42 PM PDT by true_blue_texican (grateful texan! -- whoops! I'm sober tonight, what happened?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies]

To: flaglady47
I would never say that these widows were enjoying their husbands' deaths.

One thing is certain: she loves this attention, no matter how negative it gets. She's like the "bad guy" in a wrestling match.

385 posted on 06/07/2006 8:10:57 PM PDT by sinkspur ( Don Cheech. Vito Corleone would like to meet you......Vito Corleone.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 379 | View Replies]

To: Central Scrutiniser

"Cheap theatrics are no way to discuss politics."

LOL!!! Politics = Cheap theatrics.... everyone knows that!


386 posted on 06/07/2006 8:12:31 PM PDT by antceecee (Hey AG Gonzales! ENFORCE IMMIGRATION LAWS NOW!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 381 | View Replies]

To: TET1968

Thanks for the quotes from Ann - Priceless.

I'll enjoy reading them again when my book arrives.


387 posted on 06/07/2006 8:13:40 PM PDT by ChessExpert (MSM: America's one party press)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 380 | View Replies]

To: true_blue_texican
Correct, and HE didn't screw up. Meaning he suffered nothing for it.

Well, he was impeached. It's safe to say he suffered, and the adage that all publicity is a good thing clearly doesn't ring true. LOL.

388 posted on 06/07/2006 8:13:51 PM PDT by KJC1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 384 | View Replies]

To: AzaleaCity5691
I don't know why there are all these people who think it's a good thing that our countries men are becoming wusses.

I totally agree!!! I work with both men and women who have balls. And some who don't. I like the ones with balls whether they are guys or gals. ;-)
389 posted on 06/07/2006 8:15:59 PM PDT by true_blue_texican (grateful texan! -- whoops! I'm sober tonight, what happened?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 230 | View Replies]

To: Bernard
..A new record. 250 posts on an Ann Coulter thread, and only one picture...

DUDE!!! this is a record to ASHAMED OF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
390 posted on 06/07/2006 8:24:36 PM PDT by true_blue_texican (grateful texan! -- whoops! I'm sober tonight, what happened?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies]

To: KJC1
It's not a prophecy

Sorry to be so technical on this BUT; jumping the shark is a PREDICTION of FUTURE approval.
391 posted on 06/07/2006 8:26:37 PM PDT by true_blue_texican (grateful texan! -- whoops! I'm sober tonight, what happened?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 257 | View Replies]

To: pissant

I know that I share a lot of Anne's views, but she can point out their fallacies without getting so personal (what's with the playboy comment?). It's as though she is stooping to their level. I agree with her basic conclusion about the 9/11 widows but I think she could have used more tact.


392 posted on 06/07/2006 8:26:43 PM PDT by derllak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77
Well...they are witches.
393 posted on 06/07/2006 8:28:19 PM PDT by tame (Are you willing to be as SHAMELESS for the truth as leftists are for a lie?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
..Coulter's goal was to provide the kind of over-the-top statement that would get people to buy her book and nothing else....

That is, indeed, a NON-SEQUITUR.
394 posted on 06/07/2006 8:28:37 PM PDT by true_blue_texican (grateful texan! -- whoops! I'm sober tonight, what happened?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 263 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot
I remember many years ago when an aircraft from my squadron was involved in mid air collision.

A 141 off of the SW coast of Africa? Going back to Ascension?

395 posted on 06/07/2006 8:30:33 PM PDT by NoCurrentFreeperByThatName
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: true_blue_texican
Sorry to be so technical on this BUT; jumping the shark is a PREDICTION of FUTURE approval.

I accept your apology. ;^) I do think that if Ann is not toast, she is on the road to toastdom very soon, and it will be traced back to these comments. Very unfortunate.

396 posted on 06/07/2006 8:32:03 PM PDT by KJC1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 391 | View Replies]

To: KJC1
Coulter is over the top sometimes, and this is a prime example.

I agree. Coulter is great! The "witches" have been exposed. Thanks for agreeing with us.

397 posted on 06/07/2006 8:36:00 PM PDT by ExtremeUnction
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

One thing is certain: she loves this attention, no matter how negative it gets. She's like the "bad guy" in a wrestling match.

RINO's, who are really moderatest to liberals, don't like Ann. Is that you?


398 posted on 06/07/2006 8:37:04 PM PDT by flaglady47
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 385 | View Replies]

To: KJC1

"She lost credibility, big-time."

We'll see. Her book will be #1 in short order. Many conservatives think she has great credibility and that she says what they all want to say but don't have a platform to say it on. RINO's, on the other hand, will have problems with Ann, as they really aren't conservatives anyhow.


399 posted on 06/07/2006 8:40:18 PM PDT by flaglady47
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 382 | View Replies]

To: KJC1
A new record. 250 posts on an Ann Coulter thread, and only one picture. Sign of the times, perhaps. Unless there are pics of her jumping the shark. ;^)

Actually, I think the lack of photos (genuflect for having committed sin) is indicative of the argument on this thread: namely that Ann did NOT screw up and that we ARE talking about the meat of this issue: The Jersey Girls and the fact that the MSM treats them as though they speak ex cathedra. Go over to DUmmies and you'll see that whether they agree or disagree with each other every post has a word that rhymes with CHUCK! And over here, we agree and disagree EVEN PERSONALLY!! but we don't stoop to DUmmy levels. Now where are the D@MMMMNNNN PICTURES???!?!?!?!?!
400 posted on 06/07/2006 8:44:02 PM PDT by true_blue_texican (grateful texan! -- whoops! I'm sober tonight, what happened?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 295 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 361-380381-400401-420 ... 601-602 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson