Skip to comments.
Coulter calls 9/11 widows "witches" (Lying Headline from Reuters)
Reuters via Yahoo! News ^
| June 7, 2006
| Claudia Parsons
Posted on 06/07/2006 4:51:37 PM PDT by new yorker 77
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 361-380, 381-400, 401-420 ... 601-602 next last
To: flaglady47
When you shoot from the hip, you tend to blow off a few of your own toes if you don't do it right.
She is not my cup of tea, and I think she hurts the conservative cause more than she helps it. Cheap theatrics are no way to discuss politics.
To: flaglady47
Ann cuts through all of that and slays them with clarity. Oh yes, clarity like:
"By the way, how do we know their husbands weren't planning to divorce these harpies? Now that their shelf life is dwindling, they'd better hurry up and appear in Playboy."
Clarity? I call that muddying and effing things up. She couldn't back that cheap-shot up if her life depended on it. She lost credibility, big-time.
382
posted on
06/07/2006 8:03:02 PM PDT
by
KJC1
To: flaglady47
AMEN AMEN AMEN AMEN AMEN. I don't care what she said about anybody who is against, our security,undermines our war.
And who is encouraged by code pink moonbats, and democRats to push the liberal agenda.
To: KJC1
Everyone was talking about Clinton's BJ too.
Correct, and HE didn't screw up. Meaning he suffered nothing for it. Ann and conservatism will suffer nothing for her stinging remarks.
384
posted on
06/07/2006 8:10:42 PM PDT
by
true_blue_texican
(grateful texan! -- whoops! I'm sober tonight, what happened?)
To: flaglady47
I would never say that these widows were enjoying their husbands' deaths.
One thing is certain: she loves this attention, no matter how negative it gets. She's like the "bad guy" in a wrestling match.
385
posted on
06/07/2006 8:10:57 PM PDT
by
sinkspur
( Don Cheech. Vito Corleone would like to meet you......Vito Corleone.....)
To: Central Scrutiniser
"Cheap theatrics are no way to discuss politics."
LOL!!! Politics = Cheap theatrics.... everyone knows that!
386
posted on
06/07/2006 8:12:31 PM PDT
by
antceecee
(Hey AG Gonzales! ENFORCE IMMIGRATION LAWS NOW!!!)
To: TET1968
Thanks for the quotes from Ann - Priceless.
I'll enjoy reading them again when my book arrives.
387
posted on
06/07/2006 8:13:40 PM PDT
by
ChessExpert
(MSM: America's one party press)
To: true_blue_texican
Correct, and HE didn't screw up. Meaning he suffered nothing for it.Well, he was impeached. It's safe to say he suffered, and the adage that all publicity is a good thing clearly doesn't ring true. LOL.
388
posted on
06/07/2006 8:13:51 PM PDT
by
KJC1
To: AzaleaCity5691
I don't know why there are all these people who think it's a good thing that our countries men are becoming wusses.
I totally agree!!! I work with both men and women who have balls. And some who don't. I like the ones with balls whether they are guys or gals. ;-)
389
posted on
06/07/2006 8:15:59 PM PDT
by
true_blue_texican
(grateful texan! -- whoops! I'm sober tonight, what happened?)
To: Bernard
..A new record. 250 posts on an Ann Coulter thread, and only one picture...
DUDE!!! this is a record to ASHAMED OF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
390
posted on
06/07/2006 8:24:36 PM PDT
by
true_blue_texican
(grateful texan! -- whoops! I'm sober tonight, what happened?)
To: KJC1
It's not a prophecy
Sorry to be so technical on this BUT; jumping the shark is a PREDICTION of FUTURE approval.
391
posted on
06/07/2006 8:26:37 PM PDT
by
true_blue_texican
(grateful texan! -- whoops! I'm sober tonight, what happened?)
To: pissant
I know that I share a lot of Anne's views, but she can point out their fallacies without getting so personal (what's with the playboy comment?). It's as though she is stooping to their level. I agree with her basic conclusion about the 9/11 widows but I think she could have used more tact.
392
posted on
06/07/2006 8:26:43 PM PDT
by
derllak
To: new yorker 77
Well...they are witches.
393
posted on
06/07/2006 8:28:19 PM PDT
by
tame
(Are you willing to be as SHAMELESS for the truth as leftists are for a lie?)
To: Non-Sequitur
..Coulter's goal was to provide the kind of over-the-top statement that would get people to buy her book and nothing else....
That is, indeed, a NON-SEQUITUR.
394
posted on
06/07/2006 8:28:37 PM PDT
by
true_blue_texican
(grateful texan! -- whoops! I'm sober tonight, what happened?)
To: SkyPilot
I remember many years ago when an aircraft from my squadron was involved in mid air collision.A 141 off of the SW coast of Africa? Going back to Ascension?
To: true_blue_texican
Sorry to be so technical on this BUT; jumping the shark is a PREDICTION of FUTURE approval.I accept your apology. ;^) I do think that if Ann is not toast, she is on the road to toastdom very soon, and it will be traced back to these comments. Very unfortunate.
396
posted on
06/07/2006 8:32:03 PM PDT
by
KJC1
To: KJC1
Coulter is over the top sometimes, and this is a prime example. I agree. Coulter is great! The "witches" have been exposed. Thanks for agreeing with us.
To: sinkspur
One thing is certain: she loves this attention, no matter how negative it gets. She's like the "bad guy" in a wrestling match.
RINO's, who are really moderatest to liberals, don't like Ann. Is that you?
To: KJC1
"She lost credibility, big-time."
We'll see. Her book will be #1 in short order. Many conservatives think she has great credibility and that she says what they all want to say but don't have a platform to say it on. RINO's, on the other hand, will have problems with Ann, as they really aren't conservatives anyhow.
To: KJC1
A new record. 250 posts on an Ann Coulter thread, and only one picture. Sign of the times, perhaps. Unless there are pics of her jumping the shark. ;^)
Actually, I think the lack of photos (genuflect for having committed sin) is indicative of the argument on this thread: namely that Ann did NOT screw up and that we ARE talking about the meat of this issue: The Jersey Girls and the fact that the MSM treats them as though they speak ex cathedra. Go over to DUmmies and you'll see that whether they agree or disagree with each other every post has a word that rhymes with CHUCK! And over here, we agree and disagree EVEN PERSONALLY!! but we don't stoop to DUmmy levels. Now where are the D@MMMMNNNN PICTURES???!?!?!?!?!
400
posted on
06/07/2006 8:44:02 PM PDT
by
true_blue_texican
(grateful texan! -- whoops! I'm sober tonight, what happened?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 361-380, 381-400, 401-420 ... 601-602 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson